Demonstration prototype using fictional Demo Data. Not a production system — does not provide medical, legal, financial, or clinical advice.
Trusted AI

Experiment Center

Disciplined product iteration across the guided support workflow — illustrative results, not real performance data.

Guided support intake versus open chat

Workflow v2.4 · Started Aug 10, 2026

In progress

Structured intake improves handoff completeness without harming member satisfaction.

Target member segment
New members, first support conversation, all partners
Success metric
Handoff completeness
Guardrail metric
Member satisfaction
A — Open chat (control)
68% · n=1,840
B — Guided structured intake (test)
82% · n=1,795

Handoff completeness is meaningfully higher with guided intake; satisfaction guardrail is holding steady, not yet statistically confirmed.

Statistical confidence: 88%Recommendation: Iterate

Approved-resource placement in AI summary

Workflow v2.4 · Started Aug 15, 2026

In progress

Surfacing approved resources above the recommended next step increases resource engagement.

Target member segment
All members with a completed guided conversation
Success metric
Resource click-through rate
Guardrail metric
Time to complete conversation
A — Resources below next step (control)
14% · n=1,420
B — Resources above next step (test)
17% · n=1,467

Directionally positive; sample size not yet sufficient for a confident read.

Statistical confidence: 61%Recommendation: Too early

Plain-language rewrite of routing explanation

Workflow v2.3 · Started Jun 1, 2026

Complete

A simpler explanation of why a case was routed to a specialist reduces repeat contacts on the same topic.

Target member segment
Members whose request was routed to a specialist
Success metric
Repeat-contact rate
Guardrail metric
Member satisfaction
A — Standard routing explanation (control)
19% · n=2,600
B — Plain-language rewrite (test)
11% · n=2,588

Plain-language rewrite reduced repeat contacts with no change to satisfaction. Rolled into Workflow v2.4.

Statistical confidence: 97%Recommendation: Scale